Defined ~ Centre of rotation

Defined ~ Center of Rotation

The centre point of the circle the poi is spinning. The following terms are used to define different centres of rotation:

Poi-Based

Full Isolation - Poi Head

Three quarter isolation - one quarter down poi length

Isolation/Half isolation - Centre of Poi

Quarter isolation - one quarter down poi length

Ordinary Circle/Hand circle - Poi handle

Body based

Ordinary Circle/Hand circle - Hand (in both categories)

Elbow circle - Elbow

Arm/Shoulder circle - Shoulder

Comments

Hey there

All that sounds good, simple and informative. However something crossed my mind

Would a wrap or a thru wrap change the center of rotation? ie, when in a thru wrap , its not isolating the string but the center of rotation is at differant parts of the string, or it could be seen as rotating from that body part, which could be any part really. Would this count as center of rotation or is it not established enough?

So other than that question, good job Sphism/gigglesmiley

-Catherine/Poikid-

I'd say that in a wrap you're temporarily changing the centre of rotation to the point at which the poi contacts the body... but it's only temporary for as long as the wrap takes. So it's a special case I guess... if you're just (for instance) bouncing a poi off your arm and back you've not really changed the centre of rotation.

Ok so maybe the center of rotation should be applied to something that completes a beat??

Nah, because you can have carries (which don't complete a beat) with different centres of rotation. I think it applies to anything where the move is based on rotation i.e. not wraps and stalls. Or Gilligans, heh.

True... firstly, whats a Gilligan, and secondly (is that a word? Eek! maybe its twicely......doubly...ooph...) i thought carry=thru wrap.

A Gilligan is where you let the poi hang and move your hand around Sphism/gigglesmiley It's a bit of a pisstake (it's named after a juggling guy who hates poi) but there are things you can do with them Sphism/winksmiley

And carries aren't thru-wraps, they're something else completely... see the thread on the carry definition Sphism/smilesmiley

Eek I just looked there I coulda sworn someone said they were the same...stupid memory. Will go look again Sphism/smilesmiley

Someone did, but they were wrong Sphism/gigglesmiley Carry is another club-swinging term I think, so predates poi.

Wise man say 'Man who hate poi, hate himself'

¦m¦

completely off topic:

Does club swinging really outdate poi??? Unless youre talking about cave men i reckon they evolved aroung the same time???

Plus who ever said that club swinging terminology was anything to go by???

¦m¦

Hear hear!

Club-swinging came from India around when we occupied them... it was pretty big last century. While it may or may not predate traditional Maori poi, pretty much the style of poi we spin has far more in common with Indian club-swinging in terms of moves and style than it does with what the Maoris do.

Hence the argument for using the same terminology... it's already there to describe a lot of the things we do... fountains, waist wrap, cross-follow, carries etc. Michal Kahn's book also uses the same terminology, and why invent a new term for something that already has one which will just mean that there's more confusion and less opportunity for cross-pollination of ideas?

Still off topic:

Michal Kahn's book is great 'n'all but IMHO the terminology sucks.

My friend had it and I had already taught her a lot of things but she couldn't understand the book very well at all, I had enough trouble trying to explain it to her.

Just because this terminology already exists is a near pointless arguement. Somethings existance doesnt make it correct.

I understand that any hybrid terminology should be close to what is already familiar so that the transition isn't too tricky.

I can't give examples cos i don't have a copy of the book, plus i never learned club swinging.

But come on, windmill, corkscrew and 2 beat weave :roll: . IMO that's 3 names for the same thing. This is a blatant example but i think that this runs pretty deep in the terminology we have.

[endrant]

Yeh

Lol its funny, it really is 3 names for one thing. Sooo should we start saying weave in such n such plane instead of each name?

But definitally because its there doesnt mean its correct.

Quote:
But come on, windmill, corkscrew and 2 beat weave . IMO that's 3 names for the same thing. This is a blatant example but i think that this runs pretty deep in the terminology we have.

Absolutely.
But those aren't clubswinging terms.
Those are all terms created by poi people for poi people.
Clubswinging terms are generally much more logical and better thought out.

of course, if you want you can chuck out all the Clubswinging terminology and start again with a brand new poi terminology system, which is exactly what HoP did. i don't think it iswas a very good idea.

if you got Giants, why not stand on their shoulders?

Also, remember that trying to replace terminology is a useless exercise doomed to failure. You can only add to it, so make sure you add to it well, and don't duplicate names.

Finally: i reckon clubs were a lot more common than poi for the average caveman Sphism/winksmiley

Quote:
if you got Giants, why not stand on their shoulders?

Because you'll be nothing more than a copycat. Besides, the giants may not be right

I think we should just scratch out the names windmill and corkscrew, but refer to them rather as weaves in the upper wall plane or weave in the celing/floor plane or something, seems its much more accurate meself.

I don't mean to tangent but windmills and corkscrews are identical.. but they are slightlydifferent.. variations of the weave then just different places.. basically because the places put them in position where they are equal parts each arm.. rather then one all the way on one side and one all the way on the other.. which is why they are naturally even beat rather then naturally odd beat..

again I apoligize for the tanget.. I think windmill and corkscrew are just names because people feel everything should have its own name.. whether or not they help (in terms of ease of reference) or whether they clutter (as in mroe terms) is also debatable..

Dont apologize man whats the point of discussions if not to put in some tangents Sphism/winksmiley

I dont really understand what you mean with them being even beats because a weave , broken down to its smallest is an even beat and both windmills and corkscrews are very easily made odd beats.......so an explanation is advisable Sphism/gigglesmiley But I must go;...brain has shut down....

as a mod I shouldn't be continuing this thread tangent but should have discussed this under the proper heading..

weave isn't even based.. weaves are odd based.. which is why you learn typically 2, but then 3, 5, 7, not 3,4,5,6, etc.. and then weave usually ends up odd beat.. how often do you really do even beat stuff?

windmills/corkscrews are even based.. they go 2,4,6 rather then 3,5,7.. yes you can do them odd. but then you are working odd.. and you'll always end up doing even based mroe naturally and higher beated then you will the odd stuff.. because the hands are even.. and thus contribute equally.. which is why you do a 4bt windmill/corkscrews, versus a 5 beat weave..

weaves get one arm cross body which makes the need for it to change lead hands to make the pattern work easier and flow more naturally..

Oooh I see what your saying, righto

cool, i never realised that before.

but Rev, did you read the bit where i pointed out that weave, corkscrew, windmill AREN'T clubswinging terms.

Clubswingers would just call windmill & corkscrew (respectively):

Overhead alternating follow hand circles

Horizontal alternating follow hand circles

and the weave is Cross follow (or chase)

(follow meaning split-time+same direction)

I read the part.. didn't really phase me one way or another.. I hate the terms regardless of who or what coined them lol.. yet I can't help but use them..

So were there any disagreements with the definitions of centre of rotation in my first post? Sphism/gigglesmiley

Spiralx

No arguements here Sphism/gigglesmiley

Yay! Sphism/gigglesmiley

Yup. I guess we'll give it another couple of hours before making it official

Definition works for me.

Done.

Nice- so do these get locked once confirmed??

Chut

Don't think so, Chut. Doesn't seem like they should be, either. Never know when someone will find something new to bring up.

Indeed Sphism/smilesmiley

Chut